Share this:

Hammer and Scorecard, what do you know about it? Personally, I didn’t know much, I hadn’t even heard of it until just a few weeks before the 2020 Election, and even then, I brushed it off as a QAnon rabbithole. 

Until, that was, I saw Twitter flagging posts that contained the words despite the tweet’s irrelevance to elections like this one from JeremyView:

Twitter has overplayed their hand because now I, and many others, are beginning to show a great amount of interest into the software programs developed by our CIA to interfere in foreign elections.

Rose Taylor from New Right Network explains it’s origins and use in the 2020 U.S. Elections:

Dennis Montgomery a former CIA/DOD/DHS/NSA/FBI contractor turned whistleblower designed and built the software called “The Hammer.” According to an article by The American Report in 2019, this software was designed as a “foreign surveillance tool” with many safeguards in place in order to prevent it from being used as a domestic spy tool. However, the “whistleblower tapes” leaked in 2015 cover 47 leaked hard drives and testimony that reveal this software was in fact used to spy and surveille U.S. citizens, namely President Donald Trump a “zillion times.”  

This software is a CIA spy program designed to use on protected networks (like voting machines) without detection. It is important to note that Montgomery claims that in 2009, under then-President Barak Obama, this software was “commandeered and repurposed” by John Brenan and James Clapper into a “private and parallel domestic surveillance system.”

While Hammer is the software that enables access to voting machines without being detected, the more important part of this equation is the software that works with Hammer to change vote tallies during the data transfer part of reporting the tabulation totals. Scorecard is designed to change only a 3% total of votes in order to go undetected during the transfer of totals.

Kirk Wiebe, a former senior analyst at the NSA from 1975-2001, explains that Scorecard is designed to change votes “on the fly.” He says that data is grabbed in real-time and changed in microseconds. It happens so quickly that no one notices the delay. Kirk mentioned Sydney Powell’s interview with Lou Dobbs regarding the current election.

Sydney Powell spoke on Lou Dobbs’ show and stated that they have some “excellent witnesses on the issue” regarding the 2020 election. There is forensic evidence showing what data was changed, where it came from, and where it was going to. A record is kept of the original data prior to the changes made by the software.

Given all this information, and there is a lot to go through, the ramification concerning this election could be huge. As we saw in Michigan, there was a “glitch” that occurred. It was discovered that 6000 votes were incorrectly tabulated for Joe Biden that were cast for President Trump. Once the numbers were manually corrected, it flipped the county back in favor of the President. This was just one occurrence in one state.

In Spalding County Georgia, another “glitch” caused the voting systems to go offline for several hours on Election Day resulting in voting times being extended to 9:00 pm. Politico reports that Marcia Ridley, elections supervisor at Spalding County Board of Elections said that the problems with the machines were due to an “upload to the machines by one of their technicians overnight.” Ridley continued “That is something that they don’t ever do. I’ve never seen them update anything the day before the election” and that she “did not know what the upload contained.”

Could these “glitches” be a small look into what is possibly massive changes made to the voter tallies by the software Scorecard? Given that there is “forensic evidence” of changes occurring, we could be seeing one of the largest attempted coups in history. An attempted coup on the highest office in America.

Widespread Voter Fraud

It is largely touted by the Democrats that “widespread” voter fraud does not exist. However, combined with massive amounts of mail-in ballots which are uniquely susceptible to fraud, as reported by the New York Times in 2012 and the fact that according to an article by The Guardian in 2019 that “no matter who owns them, voting machines are more vulnerable to insider malfeasance than any other sector of the election industry” it is certainly a possibility.

The integrity of our elections is a cornerstone of this country. Without clear and transparent election results there will be massive civil unrest. No matter what the final results of the election are, the citizens of the United States of America deserve to know the truth.

About Author

OnlyBans

"Public opinion is remarkably accurate in its prognostication, With regard to its judgment, when two speakers of equal skill are heard advocating different alternatives, very rarely does one find the people failing to adopt the better view or incapable of appreciating the truth of what it hears.” - Discourses On Livy

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: